always something, here with cap this time...
>>36371, >>36370, >>36346, >>36350
God bless you, brothers and sisters, for your prayers.
>>36335, >>36341, >>36344, >>36346
Well I followed up on what was going down at QR this evening and here is what happened.
What's happening at our sister board?
Funny, but right after the "please pray for QR" post, I went over to QR bc I noticed they were 2 breds behind on notes and no baker. Tried to help by generating a pastebin, but it was never used. Meanwhile, was shilled like crazy. See cap.
My conclusion: Board is comp'd as all get out, due to interference by the usual suspects. Haven't backed off one bit. Got into a revealing interaction with someone who I'm pretty sure was BO pretending to be anon. This is not just a guess, see cap.
Supposedly got ebaked by an anon; that may be true. But VERY early for ghost at QR, considering Q posts there. Baker never generated a pastebin, so I got the one from the previous bread and then filled it in with notes anons retrieved from two breds--they were great. Still no baker announced, so offered to bake for one bred, red text, prolly posted twice. But nobody responded. Was there a baker? Sometime after @700, said I will bake (moar red text), but then someone sort of snuck in and baked early wo saying anything (pastebin says "virgin e-baker". Maybe. Old shill trick is posing as a beginner in order to mess up the dough.) Here is the not-ready-for-primetime pastebin.' https://pastebin.com/4GD1wk0c
This bred (#9383) was also baked by a "mystery baker." It has an incorrect number (#9384), although BO promptly corrected it after I pointed it out. Notables are also numbered wrong. If you go to the dough post, you'll see the suggested corrections to the baker (the cap shows an "anon's furious response to feedback on those).
Now, just who is this baker? Or more to the point, who is his boss?
One clue: previous bred, i was dealing with a very nasty shill who criticized me up and down. When no baker appeared, I suggested this shill do the bake. Guess what he said?
"That's the anons responsibility."
Me: "Then who the F are YOU?"
Who indeed. NOT an anon but posting as one. I'd bet good money that it's BO @FJ, because he references past interactions between us that no one else would be tracking. See cap for moar.
This post troubles me, NOT FOR NOTABLES, plz, Baker. Not now.
This is for anons, EYES ON.
Screenshot of cap may be useful.
QRB needs to stay in "tip-top" shape. Never know what changes may come.