(We) Are The News

Anon: Project Looking Glass, SWS, ANN & Q's ability to predict future events

Post 40381 View on 8kun

>>39604, >>39625 QRB #51 Project Looking Glass, con't.

THEORY

>>>/qresearch/7558746

>>>/qresearch/7558748

>>>/qresearch/7558749

>I personally believe that Looking Glass is being used in conjunction with the Sentient World SIMULATION, the foresight of the AAN, and the History of Army's Future documents. It is left to the anons to ultimately decide.

>Conclusion: The Sentient World Simulation is gaming all NSA information into possible scenarios and strategies, (implemented through JADE?)

>Q then uses elements of ARG to both disperse information and disinformation toward the execution of the PSY-OP, with the intention of implementing The Plan to return Power to the People and restoring our Republic - without Leftists rioting in mobs. It is all based on a Game Theory equation written almost 70 years ago.

>And in the end of that equation -→ Q counters [P].

>https://emerj.com/ai-future-outlook/nsa-surveillance-and-sentient-world-simulation-exploiting-privacy-to-predict-the-future/

>https://ahec.armywarcollege.edu/documents/History-of-the-Future.pdf

>http://www.u.arizona.edu/~mwalker/econ519/Nash_Eqm_ProcNAS_1950.pdf

>Sentient World Simulation (SWS):

>A Continuously Running Model of the Real World

>https://www.krannert.PURDUE.edu/academics/mis/workshop/ac2_100606.pdf

Post 40383 View on 8kun

>>>/qresearch/7558746

>Q says that "it was over before it began". Quantum computer reference.

It's funny you'd say that. I wrote this and posted it about 7-8 hours ago and I was just gonna repost it:

——————————————–

Part 1 of 3

This is not written as a hypothesis for those who reject the reality of Looking Glass technology, and are looking for an alternative theory to explain Q's ability to predict Future Events.

I personally believe that Looking Glass is being used in conjunction with the Sentient World Simulation, the foresight of the AAN, and the History of Army's Future documents. It is left to the anons to ultimately decide.

(Written in OpenOffice, I have no idea how this will format on 8kun. So get what you get, apologies if the text is not aligned, etc.)

BEGIN Q

—————————————————-

3555

How Did Q Know about the Voter ID Push Coming Almost a Year Ago? (Q Proof)

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI 30 Jul 2019 - 11:34:14 AM

https://twitter.com/elenochle/status/1156253768649830400?

Time travel is fun.

Or….

Q

—————————————————-

END Q

Here is a definite possibility to Q's coy ultimatum of “Time Travel….Or…” Only four Anons have brought up SWS according to a search of qresear.ch. Maybe this was brought up too early. I don't know.

But I am bringing up the SWS, AAN, and the Q-Group again because there are too many “coincidences” between many of Q's drops, and what the following documents reveal.

In contrast, no one has mentioned the AAN, (here or 4ch), and it's relevance to both the use of the SWS and Q's methods and Endgame.

And Q directly mentioned the Q-Group in Q-148:

BEGIN Q

—————————————————-

148

NYT/CIA Direct Attack on Q

Q!ITPb.qbhqo 12 Nov 2017 - 3:10:49 PM

NYT/Clowns In America article released today re: Q-group is a DIRECT attack/warning re: what is being dropped here.

Read between the lines.

Why was the article published today?

—————————————————-

END Q

We'll come back to the article that Q was addressing in a minute. (As it turns out, Q was acknowledging an Anon's discovery of the NYT Q-Group hit-piece in 2017.) I found a much earlier article on the Q-Group, written by the Daily Beast, authored back in 2013. We'll get to that too. Q has asked and stated the following:

“Shall We Play A Game?”

“This is NOT a game.”

I think the *question* pertains to when Q is baiting the Deep State players, and Q already knows the outcome. I think when Q says this is NOT a game, (among other things), it means that this is not a LARP based on ARG.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_reality_game

Part of Q's agenda is a PSY-OP that needs to interface with it's audience to work. It appears that through Looking Glass and the SWS, Q is determining and gaming the Future - and is using components of the ARG model as a means of dispersing the information in a Socratic Method that does not violate NATSEC; viz., “Rabbit hole” and “This Is Not A Game” (TINAG), both being terms mutually shared by Q's methods and ARG. Q and the NSA's use of John Nash's Game Theory and ARG does not make this *A Game*. There are real world ramifications and consequences to Q's Plan, and it does not matter what method is used to disperse Q's message. Said another way: Q's use of ARG does not logically mean Q is a LARP.

“This is NOT a game”.

BEGIN QUOTE:

—————————————————-

Sentient world: war games on the grandest scale

By Mark Baard 23 Jun 2007 at 09:02

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/23/sentient_worlds/

Called the Sentient World Simulation (SWS), it will be a "synthetic mirror of the real world with automated continuous calibration with respect to current real-world information", according to a concept paper for the project.

"SWS provides an environment for testing Psychological Operations (PSYOP)," the paper reads, so that military leaders can "develop and test multiple courses of action to anticipate and shape behaviors of adversaries, neutrals, and partners".

SWS also replicates financial institutions, utilities, media outlets, and street corner shops. By applying theories of economics and human psychology, its developers believe they can predict how individuals and mobs will respond to various stressors.

—————————————————-

END QUOTE

A “synthetic mirror” to “predict how individuals and MOBS will respond to various stressors”.

Q has already told us that they are returning Power to The People, and that they are trying to restore our Republic, without mass rioting of MOBS in the streets.

Here is a link to the original draft upon which the SWS is based.

Sentient World Simulation (SWS): A Continuously Running Model of the Real World

https://www.krannert.purdue.edu/academics/mis/workshop/ac2_100606.pdf

—————————————————-

END QUOTE

End Part 1

Post 40384 View on 8kun

>>>/qresearch/7558748

BEGIN QUOTE:

Last updated on May 19, 2019

Daniel Faggella is the founder and CEO at Emerj. Called upon by the United Nations, World Bank, INTERPOL, and many global enterprises, Daniel is a sought-after expert on the competitive strategy implications of AI for business and government leaders.”

Sentient World Simulation and NSA Surveillance – Exploiting Privacy to Predict the Future?

https://emerj.com/ai-future-outlook/nsa-surveillance-and-sentient-world-simulation-exploiting-privacy-to-predict-the-future/

—————————————————-

END QUOTE

The above article is written by a Snowden sympathizer and apologist.

The article below was written almost four and a half years before Q appeared on 4ch.

BEGIN QUOTE:

—————————————————-

Inside the ‘Q Group,’ the Directorate Hunting Down Edward Snowden

Eli Lake Updated Jul. 11, 2017 10:12PM ET / Published Jun. 10, 2013 12:44PM ET

The top-secret ‘Q Group’ has been chasing Edward Snowden since he disappeared in May. Eli Lake on the intel community’s internal police—and why the agency is in ‘complete freakout mode.’

https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-the-q-group-the-directorate-hunting-down-edward-snowden?ref=scroll

—————————————————-

END QUOTE.

The above artice was written just months after Snowden disappeared, and was not really a hit-piece. The NYT resurrected the story and used it as a hit-piece, shortly after Q had taken the stage on 4ch. Q directly responded on 4ch about the NYT article, and in Q-148, plainly stated that the article was written about Q.

(Why does anyone doubt Q's existence?) But let's move on.

Suggested reading: A History of the Army's Future: 1990-2018v. 2.0

https://ahec.armywarcollege.edu/documents/History-of-the-Future.pdf

This document mentions the Army After Next (AAN), and I haven't been able to find a PDF of the original at this time. (I have the AAN v. 1.0 off-line, but can't access it right now.) It described soldiers with neural implants who were linked into a battle simulation computer, where I presume, the SWS linked (with JADE) for real-time decision and execution of battle plans and the real-world deployment of personnel/UAVs/Air Defense.

The AAN goes further to state that by the year 2015, soldiers in the field – via their neural implant, would control UAVs for both defense and reconnaissance. Although this document claims that many of the AAN's projections were “too far” and therefore not plausible, I cannot agree because I personally saw these UAVs in action during Jade Helm. I cannot say whether or not they were remote controlled via a neural connection. But I know what I saw. These UAVs literally look like the typical, saucer-shaped, silent, “UFO”.

Now read what the document says:

BEGIN QUOTE:

—————————————————-

“The whole AAN concept of “Full-Spectrum Dominance” was loosely based on Operation JUST CAUSE, with a simultaneous take down of all critical nodes and complete domination of the battlefield from Earth to space.”

https://ahec.armywarcollege.edu/documents/History-of-the-Future.pdf

—————————————————-

END QUOTE.

“Full-Spectrum Dominance…from Earth to space.”

Space Force already exists. POTUS has simply called it out of the shadows.

And listen to what A History of Army's Future said when quoting AAN:

BEGIN QUOTE:

—————————————————-

“How do you predict the future in 2020 accurately? You don’t. But what you try to do is not necessarily so much get it exactly right, but make sure you don’t get it exactly wrong. And so AAN was all about trying to predict the future and also what the Army would be required to do in that future world. . . . What we tried to do was to project ourselves out to 2020 and then look back to where we were today and to get the azimuth and path of change.”

https://ahec.armywarcollege.edu/documents/History-of-the-Future.pdf

—————————————————-

END QUOTE.

The SWS and AAN - Projecting into the Future to look Back?

Sounds familiar.

BEGIN Q:

—————————————————-

3585 8kun Routes Through DoD Server

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI 11 Nov 2019 - 5:49:10 PM

https://twitter.com/fillasaufical/status/1194044070039085057?

Project Looking Glass?

Going Forward in Order to Look Back.

Q

—————————————————-

END Q

End Part 2

Post 40385 View on 8kun

>>>/qresearch/7558749

BEGIN Q:

—————————————————-

3585 8kun Routes Through DoD Server

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI 11 Nov 2019 - 5:49:10 PM

https://twitter.com/fillasaufical/status/1194044070039085057?

Project Looking Glass?

Going Forward in Order to Look Back.

Q

—————————————————-

END Q

Again, I have no problem with the existence of Looking Glass technology, and am certainly not arguing against it's existence. But there are so many tie-ins from Q's clues to the SWS and AAN docs.

Do you believe in coincidences?

Mark Burnett produced two smash shows with “Survivor” and The “Apprentice”, both of which were based on John Nash's Game Theory. Which is the same John Nash Game Theory upon which the Sentient World Simulation is based.

BEGIN Q

—————————————————-

3702

Q!!Hs1Jq13jV6 17 Dec 2019 - 11:48:20 AM

Transparency & Accountability is the only way forward to save the Republic.

This is not another 4-year election.

Game theory.

Q

—————————————————-

END Q

In the end of John Nash's Game Theory, originally titled, “Equilibrium points in N-person games”…. Q counters P.

BEGIN QUOTE:

—————————————————-

“The closedness is equivalent to saying: if P1,P2, . . . and Q1, Q2, . . . , Qn,, . . . are sequences of points in the product space where Qn,-> Q, Pn,-> P and Qn counters P,then Q counters P.”

http://www.u.arizona.edu/~mwalker/econ519/Nash_Eqm_ProcNAS_1950.pdf

—————————————————-

END QUOTE.

Conclusion: The Sentient World Simulation is gaming all NSA information into possible scenarios and strategies, (implemented through JADE?) Q then uses elements of ARG to both disperse information and disinformation toward the execution of the PSY-OP, with the intention of implementing The Plan to return Power to the People and restoring our Republic - without Leftists rioting in mobs. It is all based on a Game Theory equation written almost 70 years ago. And in the end of that equation -→ Q counters [P].

You can't make this shit up.

“History of Army's Future”.

“Future proves Past”.

“It was over before it began”.

BEGIN Q

—————————————————-

3673

Both John Durham and Q's Public Campaign Started on Oct 28, 2017 (Q Proof)

Q!!Hs1Jq13jV6 15 Dec 2019 - 3:26:45 AM

Month/day 'Durham' initiated?

Month/day 'Q' public campaign initiated?

How many coincidences before mathematically impossible?

It was over before it began.

Q

—————————————————-

END Q

And End.